Skip to content

What Rule 5.2 makes you redact from court filings, and where filings still leak

FRCP 5.2 limits what a court filing may show of SSNs, birth dates, minors' names and account numbers. Here is the rule, and where filings still leak.

DocArmor TeamUpdated

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 limits four kinds of personal identifier in anything filed with a federal court. Unless the court orders otherwise, a filing may show only the last four digits of a Social Security or taxpayer ID number, the year of a birth date, a minor's initials and the last four digits of a financial account number. Criminal Rule 49.1 adds home addresses, cut to city and state, and Bankruptcy Rule 9037 follows the civil rule.

The rule is short. Following it is harder, because the identifiers that slip through are rarely in the brief itself.

What a filing may show

IdentifierWhat the filing may showRule
Social Security numberLast four digits5.2, 49.1, 9037
Taxpayer ID numberLast four digits5.2, 49.1, 9037
Birth dateThe year5.2, 49.1, 9037
Name of a minorInitials5.2, 49.1, 9037
Financial account numberLast four digits5.2, 49.1, 9037
Home addressCity and state49.1 (criminal cases)

The limits apply to paper and electronic filings alike, and to whoever files: a party or a nonparty. The texts are Civil Rule 5.2, Criminal Rule 49.1 and Bankruptcy Rule 9037. In bankruptcy, the minors rule covers anyone other than the debtor.

The filer is responsible, not the clerk

The committee notes are direct about it: the clerk is not required to review filings for compliance, and the responsibility to redact rests with counsel and whoever makes the filing. Anything not redacted or sealed becomes available over the internet through PACER.

Filing your own information unredacted, and not under seal, waives the rule's protection for that information. The waiver reaches only the filer's own identifiers, never a witness's or a child's.

Exemptions, and what a court can add

The redaction requirement doesn't apply to a few kinds of filing, among them:

  • the record of an administrative or agency proceeding, and the official record of a state-court proceeding;
  • a court record that wasn't subject to the requirement when it was first filed;
  • an account number that identifies property in a forfeiture proceeding;
  • a pro se filing in a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254 or 2255.

Social Security appeals and immigration cases are handled differently: the parties can see the whole file remotely, but the public can see only the docket and the court's decisions online.

A court can also ask for more than the rule's minimum. The committee notes give driver's license and alien registration numbers as examples of information a protective order might cover, and a court can order a filing made under seal. Check your district's local rules and ECF procedures too, since some add their own requirements.

Where filings still leak

In April 2024 the Federal Judicial Center published a study of 4.68 million documents filed in federal courts on 37 randomly chosen days in 2022. It found 22,391 unredacted Social Security numbers belonging to about 8,300 people. Two findings show where the risk sits:

  • A few documents hold most of the exposure. 45% of those numbers sat in just 17 documents, and a single filing contained 733. One bulk exhibit can expose hundreds of people at once.
  • Bad redactions count as none. 7,669 of the numbers had been improperly redacted. In one civil case, a document with 3,099 numbers under black boxes was filed twice; anyone could delete the boxes, or copy the text from beneath them.

Those findings point to the places worth checking hardest.

Exhibits

Bank statements, tax returns, medical records and payroll reports arrive with full account numbers, Social Security numbers and birth dates on them. Many are scans, so the numbers are part of an image that a text search never sees.

Bulk data

Spreadsheets, employee and class-member lists, and claim registers put hundreds of identifiers in a single document. One missed column is hundreds of missed redactions.

Minors named in passing

Declarations and transcripts mention children casually: "my son, Diego, then eleven". A first name is still a name, so it becomes "D." The context matters too: a reader who knows the family needs little more than an age to recognize a child.

Dates of birth outside the form fields

Forms print a birth date in a labeled box that is easy to find. Transcripts, medical narratives and police reports mention it in a sentence ("born on March 3, 1987"), where only the year may stay.

The file behind the page

Document properties, comments, tracked changes and earlier versions can carry the identifiers you removed from the page. So can the text layer under a scanned image.

A checklist before you file

  • Every exhibit has been checked page by page, including scanned ones and any page OCR struggled with.
  • Social Security and taxpayer ID numbers show only the last four digits.
  • Birth dates show only the year, wherever they appear in the text.
  • Minors appear only by initials, in transcripts and declarations as well as captions.
  • Account numbers show only the last four digits, including on check images and statement headers.
  • In criminal cases, home addresses show only the city and state.
  • Anything the court has ordered protected beyond the rule is covered too.
  • Redacted text is removed, not covered, and the document properties, comments and earlier versions are clean.
  • Where the court needs the full information, it goes in under seal, with a reference list if that helps.

Where DocArmor fits

DocArmor's Legal & Court Filings (FRCP 5.2) template covers Social Security and taxpayer ID numbers, birth dates, minors' names and financial account numbers. OCR reads scanned exhibits and discovery, and every finding goes to a reviewer before export. Redacted content is removed and checked on every page, and metadata, attachments and form values are stripped, so a redaction can't be lifted by deleting a box or copying the text beneath it.

This post is general information about the federal rules, not legal advice. Check your court's local rules and any orders in your case.

Frequently asked questions

Does the court clerk check filings for redaction?

No. The committee notes to Rule 5.2 say the clerk is not required to review filings for compliance. The responsibility to redact rests with counsel and whoever makes the filing.

Can I file an unredacted copy under seal?

Yes. A party that files a redacted document may also file an unredacted copy under seal, and the court keeps it as part of the record. A filer can also submit a sealed reference list that pairs each redacted item with an identifier used in the public version.

Do exhibits have to be redacted under Rule 5.2?

Yes, once they are filed with the court. Trial exhibits that were never filed must be redacted if they are filed later, for example as part of an appeal.

What if I filed something unredacted by mistake?

Ask the court for relief: the committee notes say a filer who includes an identifier by mistake may seek it. In bankruptcy cases, Rule 9037(h) sets out a motion to redact a previously filed document, and the court must promptly restrict public access to it while the motion is pending.

Get new guides in your feed. Follow DocArmor on LinkedIn

See what DocArmor catches in your documents.

Upload a real scan, fax or record and review every finding before you export.

Free 7-day trial, 20 pages. No credit card required.